Cookie preferences
This website uses cookies, which are necessary for the technical operation of the website and are always set. Other cookies, which increase the comfort when using this website, are used for direct advertising or to facilitate interaction with other websites and social networks, are only set with your consent.
Configure | |
Configuration
Technically required
These cookies are necessary for the basic functions of the shop.
Allow all cookies
CSRF token
Cookie preferences
Currency change
Customer recognition
Customer-specific caching
Decline all cookies
Individual prices
Matches with only "plugin-mag"
PayPal payments
Selected shop
Session
Comfort functions
These cookies are used to make the shopping experience even more appealing, for example for the recognition of the visitor.
Note
Statistics & Tracking
Affiliate program
Google Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Track device being used
Save preferences | |
This item is no longer available.
ROKKER Wax Cotton Ranger Vest - brown
- Article: 102994
- Best customer reviews
- We ship the same day until 2.30 pm
- Worldwide Shipping
- Refunds within 24 hours
Buy from us!
ROKKER Biker Vest ROKKER - "Wax Cotton Ranger Vest" - brown Material: 500g/m² wax... more
ROKKER Biker Vest
ROKKER - "Wax Cotton Ranger Vest" - brown
- Material: 500g/m² wax cotton, British Millerain
- Colour: brown
- Classic fit
- Water repellent
- One way YKK zipper
- Kangaroo pockets with button closing
- Chest pockets with button closing on right and zipper on left
- Inside pockets with buttons
- Protector pocket on back
- Manufacturer: ROKKER (CH)
- Model: Wax Cotton Ranger Vest 5458
Material: | Textile |
Function: | Impact Protection |
Colour: | Brown |
Related links to "ROKKER Wax Cotton Ranger Vest - brown"
Reviews 0
Read, write and discuss reviews... more
Customer evaluation for "ROKKER Wax Cotton Ranger Vest - brown"
Write an evaluation
Reviews will be activated after verification.
Frequently asked question on "ROKKER Wax Cotton Ranger Vest - brown"
New question for this article ... New question for this article ...